The Supreme Court April 29 ruled 7-2 in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services in a case that challenged how HHS applied Congress’ formula for calculating Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital payments. The formula includes a fraction that counts supplemental security income-eligible Medicare beneficiaries in the numerator and the total Medicare-eligible population in the denominator. The court upheld HHS’s longstanding position that if a patient is ineligible for a monthly cash benefit under SSI, a hospital cannot count that person towards the SSI portion of its DSH fraction.  
 
The AHA last year filed an amicus brief in the case, arguing that HHS was undercounting the number of SSI-eligible Medicare beneficiaries by claiming patients are “entitled to” SSI benefits only if they actually receive SSI benefits, which lowers the numerator in the formula and results in smaller payments.  

Related News Articles

Headline
A House Dear Colleague letter calling on House leadership to address scheduled Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital payment cuts received signatures from…
Headline
In comments Nov. 12 to majority and minority leaders of the House and Senate, the AHA requested that Congress act on key priorities for hospitals and health…
Headline
The AHA, joined by five other national hospital associations, Aug. 14 filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to correct the Department of Health and…
Headline
The AHA Aug. 13 commented to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission in anticipation of the commission’s 2024-2025 cycle. The AHA urged MedPAC to carefully…
Headline
The Supreme Court June 10 agreed to review a case challenging how the Department of Health and Human Services applies Congress’ formula for calculating…
Perspective
Hospitals hold an extraordinary place in our society by offering comfort and caring to all who walk through their doors, regardless of ability to pay.While the…